Information Package
baskent.edu.tr

Master's of Education Administration without Thesis

EYD697

SUPERVISION AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN EDUCATION

Course Code
EYD697
Semester
Second Term (Spring)
Theory+Practice
3 + 0
ECTS
7
Course TypeCompulsory Course
Course LevelMaster's Degree Without Thesis
Year of Study1
SemesterSecond Term (Spring)
ECTS7
Name of Lecturer(s) -
Learning Outcomes

At the end of this course, the students;

  1. Will be able to explain the relationship between educational supervision and educational administration.
  2. Will be able to explain the concepts related to educational supervision and accountability.
  3. Knows the historical development of educational supervision.
  4. Knows the features of modern educational supervision.
  5. Knows the competencies of the supervisors.
  6. Will be able to explain and interpret the problems of the education system related to supervision.
  7. Interpret different audit approaches.
  8. Evaluate new approaches related to auditing.
  9. Can prepare a research proposal about educational supervision and accountability.
Mode of DeliveryFace to face
PrerequisitesNo
Recommended Optional Programme ComponentsNo
Course DescriptionThe aim of this course is to draw attention to the increasing importance and complexity of accountability in education at the theoretical and practical levels, to outline the main questions and problems related to accountability, and to develop discussion processes on the conditions and difficulties of operating accountability in education.
Course Contents
WEEK TOPICS
1st Week Introduction of the course and acquaintance
2nd Week The concept of educational supervision and its development in the historical process
3rd Week Principles of contemporary auditing.
4th Week Competencies and roles of the educational supervisor.
5th Week Audit approaches
6th Week Audit approaches
7th Week Training and development of training employees in supervision
8th Week Midterm exam
9th Week Accountability and other related concepts
10th Week Types and classification of accountability
11th Week Accountability in education and its concept and types
12th Week The system of measurement, evaluation and accountability in Education creation
13th Week Accountability policies at school
14th Week Evaluation of audit and accountability projects
Recommended or Required ReadingAccountability in Educational Organizations. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2017: 39-68
Acheson, Keith A. , Meredith Damien Gall. (1987). Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers. New York: Longman.
Angelo, Th omas A. , K. Patricia Cross (1993). Classroom Assesment Techniques: A Handbook of Colle ge Teachers. Jossey-Bass, New York.
Aydın, İnayet. (2014). Öğretimde Denetim. Ankara: PEGEM-A Yayınları.

Aydın, Mustafa. (2014). Çağdaş Eğitim Denetimi. İstanbul: Gazi Kitabevi.
Balcı, Asım (2008), ?Kamu Yönetiminde Hesap Verebilirlik Anlayışı?, A.Balcı, A.Nohutçu, N.K.Öztürk, B.Coşkun, (Ed.), Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş, Yaklaşımlar, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara.
Başar, Hüseyin. (1993). Eğitim Denetçisi. Ankara: PEGEM Yayınları.
Beycioğlu, K. ve Dönmez, B. (2009).Eğitim Denetimini Yeniden Düşünmek. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 10 (2) 71-93
Bülbül, M. Acar, M. Özdemir, S. (2018) Eğitimde Hesap Verebilirlik. PEGEM-A Yayınları
Cogan, Morris, L. (1973). Clinical Supervision. Houghton Miffl in Comp. Boston.
Erdağ, C. & Karadağ, E. (2017). Okul Hesap Verebilirliği Modelleri: Bütüncül Bir Çözümleme. İş Ahlakı Dergisi. 10, 303?341.
Glickman , D. Carl. (2002). Leadership for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curricullum Development (ASCD), USA.
Glickman D. C. , S.P.Gordon, J.M. Ross-Gordon. (2004). Supervision and Instructional Leadership. Pearson Education Inc. USA.
Glanz, J. & Neville, R. (Eds). (1996). Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues, and Controversies. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
Gündüz,Y., Göker, S.D. (2017). Eğitim Denetimi Sürecinde Hesap Verebilirlik ve Şeffaflık Uygulamaları. OMÜ Eğtim Fakültesi Dergisi. 36(1), 83-93
Himmetoğlu,B., Ayduğ, D., Bayrak, C. (2017). Opinions of School Administrators about
Oliva, P. & PawLas, G. (2004). Supervision for today?s schools. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Öztürk, N. K., ve Coşkun B. (Der.) Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar, Ankara, Seçkin Yayınevi.
Pajak, Edward. (1993). Approaches To Clinical Supervision: Alternatives for Improving Instruction. Christopher-Gordon Publisher Inc. Norwood, MA.
Samsun, N. (2003). Hesap Verebilirlik ve İyi Yönetişim? İyi Yönetişimin Temel Unsurları, Ankara, Maliye Bakanlığı Yayını.
Taner, A.,(2015). Demokrasi, hesap verme sorumluluğu ve hükümet modelleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 1, 71-92
Taymaz, Haydar (2013). Teftiş. Ankara: PEGEM-A Yayınları.
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
  • Lecture
  • Discussion
  • Questions/Answers
  • Problem Solving
  • Report Preparation
  • Presentation
Assessment Methods and Criteria
Quantity Percentage (%)
Mid-term 1 40
Total(%) 40
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%) 40
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%) 60
Total(%) 100
ECTS Allocated Based on Student Workload
Activities Quantity Duration (Hour) Total Workload (Hour)
Midterm exam 1 2 2
Preparation for Quiz
Individual or group work 14 5 70
Preparation for Final exam
Course hours 14 2 28
Preparation for Midterm exam 7 7 49
Laboratory (including preparation)
Final exam 7 7 49
Homework
Total Work Load198
Total Work Load / 30 (h)6.6
ECTS Credit of the Course7
Language of InstructionTurkish
Work Placement(s)No

Programme Qualifications / Learning Outcomes

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
K1 X X X
K2 X
K3
K4
K5
K6 X X
K7
K8
K9
K10
K11
K12
K13
K14 X X X
K15
K16