CONTEMPRARY INT. DESIGN APPROACHES AND UNIVERSAL DESIGN

IAED662

Course Code: IAED662
Semester: -
Theory+Practice: 3 + 0
ECTS: 10

Course Type

Elective Course

Course Level

Doctorate Of Science

Year of Study

Semester

ECTS

Name of Lecturer(s)

Associate Professor Betül Bilge Özdamar

Learning Outcomes

At the end of this course, the students;

Learns the universal design criteria in the interiors and masters the system solutions to be evaluated during the design/project phase.
Develops personal thinking skills for indoor accessibility values
Examines contemporary interior approaches
The responsibility of the interior architect is understood in the design for universal design approaches in contemporary interiors.

Mode of Delivery

Face to face

Prerequisites

Recommended Optional Programme Components

Course Description

This course aims to make discussions on the use of universal design criteria by all users in the widest possible way through products and interiors. Universal design values ??will be explored and evaluated through contemporary interiors and product designs.

Course Contents

WEEK	TOPICS
1^st Week	Introduction: Content, aim and scopes of the lecture
2^nd Week	Universal Design Principles, Legal Regulations for the Disabled
3^rd Week	Contemporary interiors and different user values
4^th Week	Contemporary interiors and universal design approaches
5^th Week	Contemporary interiors and universal design approaches
6^th Week	Contemporary interiors and Accessibility
7^th Week	Mid-Term/ Article pre-research submission
8^th Week	Research article review
9^th Week	Research article review
10^th Week	Article -Presentation 1 - article review
11^th Week	Article -Presentation 2 - article review
12^th Week	Article- Presentation 3 - article review
13^th Week	Article -Presentation 4 - article review
14^th Week	Article -Presentation 5 - article review
15^th Week

Recommended or Required Reading

Dobkin, I., Peterson, M.J., 1999, Gracious Spaces: Universal Interiors by Design, New York, McGraw Hill.
Hardie, G.J., Lace, J.P., 1991, Accessible Environments: Toward Universal Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold,.
Manley, S and Parnaby, R, 2001, Putting people first: comparing vision and reality in the architecture and planning course at UWE.
McColl, M.A., Bickenbach, J.E., 1998, Introduction to Disability, WB Saunders Company Ltd. Great Britain.
Peterson, M.J. 1995, Universal Kitchen Planning: Design That Adapts to People, The National Kitchen and Bath Association, Hackettstown, NJ.
Peterson, M.J. 1996, Universal Bathroom Planning: Design That Adapts to People, Hackettstown, NJ The National Kitchen and Bath Association,.
Preiser, W.F., 2001, Universal Design Handbook, McGraw Hill, New York.
The Center of Universal Design, www.design.ncsu.edu
Winters, S., Accessible Housing by Design: Universal Design Principles in Practices, New York, McGraw Hill

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

Lecture
Discussion
Problem Solving
Presentation
Report Preparation
Questions/Answers

Assessment Methods and Criteria

	Quantity	Percentage (%)
Mid-term	1	20
Assignment	1	10
Presentation of Article	1	20
Total(%)		50
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)		50
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%)		50
Total(%)		100

ECTS Allocated Based on Student Workload

Activities	Quantity	Duration (Hour)	Total Workload (Hour)
Midterm exam	1	2	2
Preparation for Quiz	0	0	0
Individual or group work	14	5	70
Preparation for Final exam	1	4	4
Course hours	14	3	42
Preparation for Midterm exam	1	4	4
Laboratory (including preparation)	0	0	0
Final exam	1	2	2
Homework	8	4	32
Research	7	4	28
Article Presentation	7	3	21
Article	14	3	42
Weekly Articles and Resource Research	14	4	56
Total Work Load			303
Total Work Load / 30 (h)			10.1
ECTS Credit of the Course			10

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Work Placement(s)

Programme Qualifications / Learning Outcomes

	LO1	LO2	LO3	LO4
K1	X	X	X	X
K2				X
K3	X	X	X	X
K4	X	X	X
K5	X
K6	X
K7
K8
K9
K10