PSIR450
CURRENT ISSUES IN TURKISH POLITICS
- Course Code
- PSIR450
- Semester
- -
- Theory+Practice
- 3 + 0
- ECTS
- 5
| Course Type | Elective Course | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course Level | Bachelor's Degree | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year of Study | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Semester | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ECTS | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Learning Outcomes |
At the end of this course, the students;
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to face | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prerequisites | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recommended Optional Programme Components | There is no recommended optional programme component for this course. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Course Description | The course covers the post-1980 developments that have left (their) marks in Turkish politics. Democratization debates, women's rights, state-society relations are among the topics to be tackled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Course Contents |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recommended or Required Reading | Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, Cambrdige University Press, Chapter 1 and 2 Schedler, Andreas (2013) Electoral Authoritharinasim, 1. Bölüm Esen, B. ve Hakan Yavuzyılmaz (2023) Demokratikleşme, Demokraside Gerileme ve Melez Rejimler, Demokrasi: Kavram, Kurum, Süreç 337-349. Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095-1113. Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third world quarterly, 37(9), 1581-1606. Çalışkan, K. (2018). Toward a new political regime in Turkey: From competitive toward full authoritarianism. New Perspectives on Turkey, 58, 5-33. Esen, Berk, Şebnem Gümüşcü, Hakan Yavuzyılmaz (2023) Türkiye'nin Yeni Rejimi: Rekabetçi Otoriterlik (İletişim Yayınları) Esen, Berk, Şebnem Gümüşcü, Hakan Yavuzyılmaz (2023) Türkiye'nin Yeni Rejimi: Rekabetçi Otoriterlik (İletişim Yayınları) Somer, M. (2016). Understanding Turkey's democratic breakdown: old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritharianism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 481-503. Köker, Levent (2020) Başkancı Rejim: Popülist yarışmacı otoriterlik mi? Diktatörlük mü? Birikim Dergisi Esen B, Gumuscu S. (2018) The Perils of Turkish Presidentialism Review of Middle East Studies, 52(1): 43-53. Özsoy Boyunsuz, Ş. (2016). The AKP'S proposal for a Turkish type of presidentialism in comparative context. Turkish Studies, 17(1), 68-90. Dikici Bilgin, Hasret (2023) Hükümet Sitemleri ve Demokrasi Demokrasi: Kavram, Kurum, Süreç, pp.229-246. Özbudun, Ergun 2013 Party Politics and Social Cleavages in Turkey Chapter 2 Selçuk, O., & Hekimci, D. (2020). The rise of the democracy-authoritarianism cleavage and opposition coordination in Turkey (2014-2019). Democratization, 27(8), 1496-1514. Somer, M. (2019). Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 42- 61. Gumuscu, S. (2013). The Emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 223-244. Ayan Musil, P. (2014). Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 20(1), 71-92. Sayari, S., & Taşkın, B. (2024). Transition from parliamentarism to presidentialism and the restructuring of the Turkish party system. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1-14. Özbudun, E. (2015). Turkey's Judiciary and the Drift Toward Competitive Authoritarianism. The International Spectator, 50(2), 42-55. Esen, Berk. 2025. Judicial Transformation in a Competitive Authoritarian Regime: Evidence from the Turkish Case. Law & Policy 47(1): e12250. Türmen, Rıza. 2023. Hukuk Devleti, Yargı ve Demokrasi Demokrasi: Kavram Kurum, Süreç, pp. 189-207. Yanatma, S. (2021). Advertising and Media Capture in Turkey: How Does the State Emerge as the Largest Advertiser with the Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(4), 797- 821. Bilge Yeşil (2018) Authoritarian Turn or Continuity Governance of Media through Capture and Discipline in the AKP Era, South European Society and Politics, 23:2,239- 257 Yabanci, B. (2019). Turkey's tamed civil society: Containment and appropriation under a competitive authoritarian regime. Journal of Civil Society, 15(4), 285-306. Dedeoglu, S. (2012). Equality, protection or discrimination: Gender equality policies in Turkey. Social Politics, 19(2), 269-290. Kandiyoti, D. (2016). Locating the politics of gender: Patriarchy, neo-liberal governance and violence in Turkey. Research and Policy on Turkey, 1(2), 103-118. Cindoglu, D., & Unal, D. (2017). Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of New Turkey. European Journal of Women's Studies, 24(1), 39-54. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assessment Methods and Criteria |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ECTS Allocated Based on Student Workload |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Work Placement(s) | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme Qualifications / Learning Outcomes
| LO1 | LO2 | LO3 | LO4 | LO5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | X | ||||
| K2 | |||||
| K3 | X | ||||
| K4 | |||||
| K5 | X | X | X | X | |
| K6 | X | X | |||
| K7 | X | ||||
| K8 | X | X | |||
| K9 | X | X | X | ||
| K10 | X | X | |||
| K11 | X | X | X | ||
| K12 | X | ||||
| K13 | X |