Can demarcate scientific disciplines from non-scientific disciplines (e.g., philosophy, astrology...etc.) according to a criterion of scientificness.
Can evaluate the history of science from a critical viewpoint (i.e., as a continiuous or discontinuous enterprise).
Can interpret science?s claim for objectivity and the embeddedness of scientific activity in socio-political structures.
Can describe the similarities and differences between natural sciences and human/social sciences.
Can interpret scientific practice on theoretical (metaphysical/philosophical) ground laid out by the discussions on necessity, regularity, causation, etc.
Mode of Delivery
Face to face
Prerequisites
No
Recommended Optional Programme Components
No
Course Description
The course is on the philosophical issues related with how science works, and on the relation of science with other disciplines of knowledge. After the discussions on the ideas developed by the logical positivists, Popper and Kuhn follows the debates on scientific realism. Moreover, some topics in the philosophy of social sciences are also covered (social ontology, social constructivism, naturalism, interpretivism, relativism).
Course Contents
WEEK
TOPICS
1st Week
Introduction of philosophy of science
2nd Week
Positivism
3rd Week
Logical positivist
4th Week
Popper and demarcation
5th Week
Reasoning and reality
6th Week
Naturalism
7th Week
Midterm
8th Week
Critical theory-I
9th Week
Critical theory -II
10th Week
Ideology and science: Habermas-I
11th Week
Ideology and science: Habermas- II
12th Week
Feminist ideology in the philosophy of science
13th Week
Philosophy of contemporary social sciences-I
14th Week
Philosophy of contemporary social sciences-II
15th Week
General assessment
Recommended or Required Reading
*Kuhn,Thomas 2006. Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı. Kırmızı Yayınları.İstanbul.
*Fay, Braian.1996. Çağdaş Sosyal Bilimler Felsefesi. Ayrıntı Yayınları. İstanbul
*Yıldırım, Cemal.2005. Bilim Felsefesi. Remzi Kitapevi. İstanbul.
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Lecture
Discussion
Questions/Answers
Assessment Methods and Criteria
Quantity
Percentage (%)
Mid-term
1
30
Assignment
2
20
Total(%)
50
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)
50
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%)