| Course Type | Elective Course |
|---|
| Course Level | Bachelor's Degree |
|---|
| Year of Study | - |
|---|
| Semester | - |
|---|
| ECTS | 3 |
|---|
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
|
| Learning Outcomes |
At the end of this course, the students;
- Understand the purpose of vocational rehabilitation and its importance for disabled people.
- Make job analysis, evaluate the working capacity and working environment.
- Know the application methods of vocational rehabilitation.
|
| Mode of Delivery | Face to face |
|---|
| Prerequisites | No |
|---|
| Recommended Optional Programme Components | None |
|---|
| Course Description | An overview of vocational rehabilitation, evaluation and education in vocational rehabilitation, ergonomics, work analysis, functional capacity evaluation, prevention of industrial injuries, workplace arrangements, home arrangements for disabled people and arrangements for environmental architectural barriers. |
|---|
| Course Contents |
| WEEK |
TOPICS |
|
1st Week |
Introduction to occupational rehabilitation |
|
2nd Week |
Definition, objectives and stages of vocational rehabilitation |
|
3rd Week |
Evaluation in occupational rehabilitation |
|
4th Week |
Evaluation in occupational rehabilitation |
|
5th Week |
Occupational analysis |
|
6th Week |
Vocational rehabilitation application methods |
|
7th Week |
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and cumulative injuries |
|
8th Week |
Midterm, general review |
|
9th Week |
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and cumulative injuries |
|
10th Week |
Anthropometry in ergonomics and environmental factors |
|
11th Week |
Ergonomic office arrangement |
|
12th Week |
Back and Neck Schools |
|
13th Week |
Environmental architectural barriers |
|
14th Week |
Evaluation of home environment |
|
15th Week |
Discussion |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading | 1. Kayıhan H, Köse B. Türkiye'de ve Dünyada Mesleki REhabilitasyon. Türkiye Klinikleri J Psychol-Special Topics. 2018;3(1):30-41.
2. Canbaz S. Mesleki Rehabilitasyon Örnekleri: Geleneksel Derleme, Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;7(4):1260-70.
3. Yararel B, Arslan K, Kılıç S, ARpacı GS. Ofis Tasarımlarında Ergonomik Koşulların Sağlanmasının Önemi. Ergonomi. 2022;5(2):84-97. |
|---|
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
|---|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria |
|
Quantity |
Percentage (%) |
| Mid-term |
1 |
50 |
| Total(%) |
|
50 |
| Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%) |
|
50 |
| Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%) |
|
50 |
| Total(%) |
|
100 |
|
| ECTS Allocated Based on Student Workload |
| Activities |
Quantity |
Duration (Hour) |
Total Workload (Hour) |
| Midterm exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Preparation for Quiz |
|
|
|
| Individual or group work |
14 |
1 |
14 |
| Preparation for Final exam |
1 |
16 |
16 |
| Course hours |
14 |
3 |
42 |
| Preparation for Midterm exam |
1 |
15 |
15 |
| Laboratory (including preparation) |
|
|
|
| Final exam |
1 |
2 |
2 |
| Homework |
|
|
|
| Total Work Load | 90 |
| Total Work Load / 30 (h) | 3 |
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 3 |
|
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
|---|
| Work Placement(s) | No |
|---|
