| Course Type | Elective Course |
|---|
| Course Level | Doctorate Of Science |
|---|
| Year of Study | - |
|---|
| Semester | - |
|---|
| ECTS | 15 |
|---|
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
|
| Learning Outcomes |
At the end of this course, the students;
- Will be able to explain international commercial arbitration.
- Will be able to learn International Arbitration Act and types of international arbitration.
- Will be able to learn the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration according to Turkish law.
|
| Mode of Delivery | Face to face |
|---|
| Prerequisites | No |
|---|
| Recommended Optional Programme Components | No |
|---|
| Course Description | Will be able to learn about the application to the arbitration. |
|---|
| Course Contents |
| WEEK |
TOPICS |
|
1st Week |
Arrangements Regarding Arbitration in Turkish Law |
|
2nd Week |
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID) |
|
3rd Week |
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) |
|
4th Week |
ConflictThe London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and American Arbitration Associat(AAA) |
|
5th Week |
Scope of International Arbitration Act |
|
6th Week |
Arbitration Agreement |
|
7th Week |
Midterm Exam |
|
8th Week |
Selection of Arbitrators |
|
9th Week |
Rules Applicable to the Arbitration Procedure and Place of Arbitration |
|
10th Week |
Arbitration Proceedings |
|
11th Week |
Right to Appeal Against to Arbitral Awards |
|
12th Week |
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards According to MÖHUK |
|
13th Week |
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards According to New York Convention |
|
14th Week |
Final Exam |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading | Ziya Akıncı: Milletlerarası Tahkim, İstanbul, 2016. Ergin Nomer, Günseli Öztekin Gelgel ve Nuray Ekşi: Milletlerarası Tahkim Hukuku Cilt:1, İstanbul 2008. Turgut Kalpsüz: Türkiye?de Milletlerarası Tahkim, 2. Baskı, Ankara 2010. |
|---|
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
- Discussion
- Questions/Answers
- Case Study
|
|---|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria |
|
Quantity |
Percentage (%) |
| Mid-term |
1 |
30 |
| Assignment |
1 |
30 |
| Total(%) |
|
60 |
| Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%) |
|
60 |
| Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%) |
|
40 |
| Total(%) |
|
100 |
|
| ECTS Allocated Based on Student Workload |
| Activities |
Quantity |
Duration (Hour) |
Total Workload (Hour) |
| Midterm exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Preparation for Quiz |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Individual or group work |
14 |
15 |
210 |
| Preparation for Final exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Course hours |
14 |
15 |
210 |
| Preparation for Midterm exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Laboratory (including preparation) |
14 |
0 |
0 |
| Final exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Homework |
2 |
15 |
30 |
| Total Work Load | 450 |
| Total Work Load / 30 (h) | 15 |
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 15 |
|
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
|---|
| Work Placement(s) | No |
|---|
